Archive for the Category » Book «

Of tea and strategy

The Republic of Tea by Mel & Patricia Ziegler and Bill Rosenzweig

And no, this is neither a post on whether or not Sun Tzu, Clausewitz or any other general or theorist ever drank tea nor a real review of The Republic of Tea book.

What I intent to do here is to see if the story in this book can fit into an existing model of strategy formation.

But first, what is in this book?

It contains the various letters and faxes between Mel Ziegler and Bill Rosenzweig in 1990 and 1991 when they worked on what would become in 1992 the Republic of Tea company.

In it, they cover everything from motivation, product ideas, marketing, packaging, relations with business angels. If you want to look how a business comes out of an idea, this is a good book.

You will even be able to find their complete business plan at the end of the book.

What is “funny” and irritating at the same time is the main difference between Mel Ziegler and Bill Rosenzweig.

The first one will focus on a philosophical approach to business while the second one tries to get the practical things first while not being really willing to fully commit itself into the business.

I looked at the Republic of Tea website before writing and although the original founders sold their company in 1994 what I found the business is still in line with their original plans (for example, the children teas or the products that were launched over the years) but is not what they originally devised or had in mind (and this changed along the book too).

My analysis is that this results from a non conscious effort between the both of them to bring together two different concepts for strategy (the deliberate and the emergent one) into something else, the realised strategy.

But first, let’s define what these concepts are and then see if I am pushing the model or if it really fits here.

For this work, I am going to use the model provided by Mintzberg and Waters in their 1985 Of Strategies,Deliberate and Emergent; Strategic Management Journal, 6, 257-272.

Realised strategy is the strategy that is actually implemented.

Intended strategy is when an organisation has decided on a consistent course of action and when all its energy is focused on realising it, it becomes a deliberate strategy.

Unrealised strategy is what I call a good idea that was not practical enough to be implemented or that was no longer adapted to the context.

Emergent strategy is the answer to unexpected opportunities or to the lack of intentions.

The way all these concepts work together is described in the picture below.

As far as the Republic of Tea is concerned, the realised strategy is pretty obvious, it is the one that has been implemented.

The other ones are probably less obvious but can be found through the whole book.

Here are some examples coming from the book.

Mel Ziegler: “The fact is that creation is a projection of what already exists. What I am saying is that The Idea existed but had not manifested.”

Bill Rosenzweig: “what is the philosophy behind the Republic of Tea?”

Mel Ziegler: “To show through the metaphor of tea, the lightness of taking life sip by sip rather than gulp by gulp.

What would you say is the business behind the philosophy?”

Bill: “The business of The Republic of Tea is to sell (which means first we have to find) the best tea on Earth.”

Bill Rosenzweig: “the game, as you have so cleverly identified it, encompasses creativity and the process of being creative.”

Bill Rosenzweig: “4. In the middle of the night last night I woke up with ideas about the structure of our organization. I roughed them out on the attached sheet. I hope you can read the writing. Feel free to build on this and let me know your thoughts. And just for the challenge of it I took a stab at the first ten-year plan. This is a good exercice, even if it has nothing to do with what we end up doing, because it forces me to think where we want to go.

5. As I roughed out that org chart last night I realized that we need to write a “product charter” that guide our product-development process.”

Bill Rosenzweig: “Here are some more down-to-earth replies:

1. You’re right about painting our world too small [...] I also find the packaging and pricing very intriguing. [...]

I am working on a new diagram for us to show categories and distribution.[...] Waiting to have some information to come in before I can complete it.

3. Industry research. [...] It will be important for us to feel confident about our point of entry.”

Bill Rosenzweig: “Last night it struck me that maybe it’s time for me to get somebody who’s a little less emotional about tea to tale a look at the business, and so I’ve appointed the other half of my brain as The Minister of Research, and here for a start is what I want him to find out:”

This is followed by a complete description of what is a tea industry analysis.

Mel Ziegler: “The key will be to find the right-talented like-minded people to own the offshoot business, and to lure them into helping the Republic of Tea creates itself.”

As you can see, we have two different strategy processes going on at the same time.

One that is rather predetermined and consistent all along the way, this is the intended/deliberate strategy.

The other one is dependent upon the circumstances and evolves all along the creation of the Republic of Tea. It is the emergent strategy that shapes the intended/deliberate one into what become the realised strategy.

Following Mintzberg and Waters’ classification of the different types of strategy processes, we are here typically in what they call a process strategy where the leadership focuses on designing the system that forms the ground from which the different patterns of action comes out.

You will say that this is what all new businesses do.

Perhaps but it is the first time I see this written in a book as most of the time, you only hear about how the creators had a wonderful idea, made it and sold it.

This alone makes the book worth reading.

Category: Book, Industry, Theory  4 Comments

Tea and Opium

For All the Tea in China: How England Stole the World’s Favorite Drink and Changed History by Sarah Rose

 

To summarize it in a few words, this books is the story of how Robert Fortune stole the secrets of tea for the British East India Company to bring them from China to India in the middle of the 19th century.

Yes, this is right: tea was right in the middle of a James Bond novel, perhaps not the modern James Bond but at least a Victorian one.

But this is not what is really interesting in this book (or at least not for this blog). What I found truly fascinating are the reasons behind him stealing the secrets of tea.

Let’s sum up thFlag of the British East India Companyings: the introduction of tea in India and in the Darjeeling Estates is the result of an immune system, the immune system of one of the first megacorporation known to the world: the East India Company or British East India Company.

But in order to understand this, two little steps back in time are needed:

First, how was the trade balance between European powers and China? To be honest, it was not good: demand for Chinese products (tea, silk and porcelain among others) was high while China had no need for European products and wanted silver. For the mercantilist economists that ruled in Europe during that era, this resulted in a impoverishment (as the prosperity of a State depended on the amount of precious metal it owned) and this was not a viable solution on the long run. For the United Kingdom, it was even worst as it no longer used silver standard but gold one and it had to buy silver from other European countries, losing a bit of money each time.

This is why the East India Company, which held a monopoly over trade with the Far East (via a royal charter) decided to sell a high value commodity: opium (produced in the Bengal area, that more or less belonged to the British East India Company since Clive’s victory at the battle of Plassey in 1757).

Ship of the British East India Company

The high prices and increasing demand (from an estimate of 15 tons in 1730 to 900 tons in the 1820s) made sure that the trade balance was improving (Great Britain even fought two wars against China to keep this business running).

 

Then why did the East India Company needed to steal the secrets of tea? There are several answers to this question: first of all, they were slowly losing their trade monopoly (first with India and then with China) and were unable to cope with the new competitors (including other countries); they also needed more money to deal with wars and expansion on the Indian borders (which the Company paid for); last but not least, they were afraid that China might legalise the cultivation of opium and/or steal it from India (the Bengali opium was of higher quality than the Chinese one).

In order to solve all these problems, the British East India Company decided to produce their own tea in Darjeeling, a place that seemed well suited for these products. The first intents used tea found in Assam and tea smuggled of Canton but it was not a success and quality was low.

Now, you get the overall picture. The British East India Company had to deal with a big problem as they needed more money but had to give a lot of it to their suppliers.

This is the reason behind their first move: replacing money by another product, one that they could produce rather easily and that was highly addictive (making it even more profitable): opium.

The next evolution came from the increased competition (with the end of the trade monopoly) and the fears that China might become a competitor for the Indian opium. The only solution the British East India Company found was to keep on producing opium for the Chinese while at the same time, they tried to launch their own production of tea to take away that market from China.

The end result was an increase of the profits as once the quality had increased and the industrial processes were known, the Indian production could be sold on the London market while being promoted as safer as the Chinese one (as the Chinese used some dangerous chemical products to make their green leaves greener as Westerners always wanted the greenest ones).

 

In modern times, we would use words such as trade war, industrial espionage, marketing,…

Without judging its ethics or its success, it seems that the British East India Company was rather modern when it comes to business survival and evolution and that it was indeed the first megacorporation (in a true cyberpunk way) in history.

Skysa App Bar